VARIETAL TRIALS OF FARM CROPS - 1979
 
 Successful crop production depends to a considerable extent on
 selecting the best varieties for a particular farm.
 
 To provide a basis for the selection of varieties, the Minnesota
 Agricultural Experiment Station compares varieties in trial
 plots. These trials are conducted on the Agricultural Experiment
 Stations at St. Paul, Rosemount, Waseca, Lamberton, Morris,
 Crookston, Grand Rapids, and Becker, and on farmers' fields.
 
 Recommended varieties, important old varieties, and new varieties
 are grown in replicated plots at each location. These plots are
 handled so that the factors affecting yield and other
 characteristics are as nearly the same for all varieties at each
 location as is possible.
 
 On the basis of these comparative trials, the list of varieties
 recommended for use in Minnesota is revised each year by the
 Experiment Station Crop Variety Review Committee.
 
 For crops where recommendations are made, varietal descriptions
 are arranged in order of "recommended varieties," I varieties not
 adequately tested," and "other varieties," and in alphabetical
 order within each group.
 
 Recommended varieties have performed better than other varieties
 in important characteristics in comparative tests. A variety
 usually is not eligible for recommendation until it has been
 tested in Minnesota for at least 3 years. New varieties from
 other public experiment stations and private plant breeders but
 not sufficiently evaluated here are listed as "not adequately
 tested." Information now available regarding these varieties is
 presented but no conclusions are drawn regarding their
 suitability under Minnesota conditions.
 
 Varieties listed in the "other varieties" category are usually
 inferior in one or more characteristics, as demonstrated in
 comparative tests.
 
 The LSD (Least Significant Difference) figures listed under the
 yield columns in the tables are statistical measures of
 variability within the trials. This statistic is used to
 determine whether the difference between two yields is due to
 genetic difference in the varieties or to other causes such as soil 
 variability. If the yield difference between two varieties equals 
 or exceeds the LSD, one can conclude that the higher yielding 
 variety was superior in yield. If the difference is less than 
 the LSD, the yield difference was probably due to environmental 
 rather than varietal differences. The 5 percent significance 
 level used in this report is based on odds of 19 to 1 that yields 
 differing by the amount of the LSD were truly different.
 
 Data for varieties not included in all trials averaged
 within a table have been adjusted so that averages of varieties
 tested for different numbers of years can be compared directly.
 But use of the LSD for these comparisons is not valid.  These
 trials are designed for variety and not crop (species)
 comparisons, because the various crops were grown on different
 fields or with different management. The data should only be used
 to compare varieties within a table.
 
 Relative maturities of varieties are indicated in the tables as
 date mature, heading, or blooming; days to mature, heading, or
 blooming; or moisture percentage at harvest.
 
 The use of certified seed of recommended varieties is suggested.
 Varieties eligible for certification by the Minnesota Crop
 Improvement Association include varieties recommended by the
 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, certain new varieties
 not adequately tested in Minnesota, and certain nonrecommended
 varieties. Certification does not imply recommendation.
 
 Registered and certified seed of most varieties described in this
 report can be purchased from seed dealers or from growers listed
 in the Minnesota Registered and Certified Seed Directory for 1979
 Planting. This annual publication can be obtained without charge
 from the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association, 1900 Hendon
 Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, or from county extension
 agents' offices.
 
 Authors of the following sections are: hard red spring, and
 winter wheat, R.H. Busch;  Extension agronomist L.L. Hardman also
 participated in preparing this publication.
 
 Information on the reaction of varieties to specific pathogens
 was largely obtained by the following members of the Department
 of Plant Pathology: D.V. McVey, wheat; A.P. Roelfs, barley, oat,
 and wheat; P.G. Rothman, oat; R.D. Wilcoxson, barley, wheat, and
 oat.
 
 Field work of the varietal trials at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris,
 Crookston, and Grand Rapids was supervised by W.E. Lueschen, J.H.
 Ford, D.D. Warnes, J.V. Wiersma, and D.L. Rabas, respectively.