Table 31. Disease notes from 1995 Kansas Winter Wheat Performance Tests.
RL RL RL RL LB FD FI
Brand Cultivar G\1 G\2 R\3 S\4 B\5 F\6 F\6
AgriPro AP 7301 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4.3
AgriPro AP 7501 5 8 R 5 -- -- 4
AgriPro AP 7601 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.8
AgriPro WX92-0408 Exp 3 7 R 3 -- -- 3.3
AgriPro WX92-3210 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- 4
AgriPro Coronado 5 7 trMR 5 6 5.8 5.5
AgriPro Rowdy 7 9 R 9 6 -- 4
AgriPro Laredo -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 4.3
AgriPro Longhorn -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 --
AgriPro Hickok 7 9 R 9 -- -- 4.5
AgriPro Ogallala -- -- -- -- -- 3 4
AgriPro Pecos -- -- -- -- 7.3 -- 5
AgriPro Ponderosa -- -- -- -- -- -- --
AgriPro Tomahawk -- -- -- -- -- -- --
AgriPro (S) Boone 2 4 R 4 5.5 -- --
AGSECO Mankato -- -- -- -- -- -- --
AGSECO 7805 -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 --
AGSECO 7853 7 9 10S 8 5.5 2.8 2
AGSECO 9001 -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 3.5
AGSECO Colby 94 -- -- -- -- -- 3.3 --
AWWPA (W) Rio Blanco -- -- -- -- 7.3 3 4.3
AWWPA (W) Oro Blanco 6 9 20S 7 7.3 3.3 4
Century II Discovery 8 9 trS 6 5.5 -- --
Century II Voyager -- -- -- -- -- 4.5 4.5
Century II (S) 2500 2 3 R 3 6.8 -- --
NK (S) Coker 9474 -- -- -- -- 4.3 -- --
NK (S) Coker 9543 -- -- -- -- 4.3 -- --
Ohlde (S) T441 1 2 R 1 3.8 -- --
Quantum XH1520 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Quantum XH1706 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Star Champ 5 9 trMR 7 -- -- --
Star Salute 5 9 R 6 -- -- --
Terra HR 153 -- -- -- -- 4.8 -- --
Terra (S) SR 204 -- -- -- -- 6.8 -- --
Terra (S) SR 205 -- -- -- -- 6.8 -- --
--- 2163 3 7 20MS 3 5.3 3.5 4
--- 2180 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4.8
--- Akron -- -- -- -- -- 3 --
--- Alliance -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--- Arapahoe 4 7 trMR 4 -- 2 --
--- Arkan 7 9 20S 7 7 -- --
--- Cimarron 9 9 40S 8 6.5 2.3 3.8
--- Custer 4 9 R 6 4.8 3.3 3.8
--- Halt -- -- -- -- -- 5 --
--- Ike 8 9 40S 7 5.8 2.5 3
--- Jagger 2 4 R 2 6 4 3.8
--- Jules -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 --
--- Karl 8 9 60S 4 8 3.5 4.3
--- Karl 92 8 9 60S 4 8.3 2.8 3.8
--- KS91H153-2 4 9 R 4 6.3 3.8 4
--- KS92PO263-137 3 6 20MS 3 5.8 2.8 3.3
--- Larned 8 9 40S 8 8.5 4.8 --
--- Niobrara 6 9 20MS 8 -- 2 --
--- Newton 9 9 80S 8 8.5 4.3 4.5
--- Scout 66 9 9 30S 9 8.8 4.3 --
--- TAM 107 9 9 80S 5 8.3 4.5 4.5
--- TAM 200 -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 4.3
--- Tonkawa 6 9 R 7 6.5 3.5 4.3
--- Triumph 64 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--- Vista 7 9 trMR 9 -- 2 --
--- Yuma -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 5.3
--- (S) Caldwell 4 7 trMS 3 7 -- --
--- (S) Cardinal 4 5 10MR 3 5.3 -- --
--- (S) Clark 3 7 trMR 3 5.8 -- --
--- (S) Ernie 5 8 30S 5 7 -- --
--- (S) Excel 3 7 R 4 5.5 -- --
--- (S) Freedom 5 7 trMR 4 6.5 -- --
--- (S) Jackson 4 7 10S 3 5.3 -- --
--- (S) MO12258Exp 4 6 trS 3 7.8 -- --
--- (W) Arlin 5 8 20MS 7 7.5 6.3 4.5
Test Average 5.2 7.5 -- 4.9 6.4 3.5 4.1
C.V. (%) -- -- -- -- -- 23 20.2
L.S.D.(0.05) -- -- -- -- 0.8 1 1
Unless otherwise indicated, ratings are on a 1-9 scale with 1 best and
9 poorest. These ratings are from individual tests and may not
characterize the reaction of a variety under all circumstances.
Several ratings have no C.V. or L.S.D. because they were unreplicated.
\1 Green leaf duration, first note. A visual estimate of how well the
flag leaf is holding up after anthesis.
\2 Green leaf duration, second note. Examining both ratings provides
a picture of how the leaves held up under disease pressure over time.
\3 Rust; number quantifies leaf area affected as a percentage, letters
characterize reaction: S = susceptible, MR = moderately resistant, etc.
\4 Septoria tritici.
\5 Barley yellow dwarf virus.
\6 Freeze damage note taken 5/16, several weeks after a hard freeze on April 10-11.