Table 31. Disease notes from 1995 Kansas Winter Wheat Performance Tests. RL RL RL RL LB FD FI Brand Cultivar G\1 G\2 R\3 S\4 B\5 F\6 F\6 AgriPro AP 7301 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4.3 AgriPro AP 7501 5 8 R 5 -- -- 4 AgriPro AP 7601 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 AgriPro WX92-0408 Exp 3 7 R 3 -- -- 3.3 AgriPro WX92-3210 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 AgriPro Coronado 5 7 trMR 5 6 5.8 5.5 AgriPro Rowdy 7 9 R 9 6 -- 4 AgriPro Laredo -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 4.3 AgriPro Longhorn -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 -- AgriPro Hickok 7 9 R 9 -- -- 4.5 AgriPro Ogallala -- -- -- -- -- 3 4 AgriPro Pecos -- -- -- -- 7.3 -- 5 AgriPro Ponderosa -- -- -- -- -- -- -- AgriPro Tomahawk -- -- -- -- -- -- -- AgriPro (S) Boone 2 4 R 4 5.5 -- -- AGSECO Mankato -- -- -- -- -- -- -- AGSECO 7805 -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 -- AGSECO 7853 7 9 10S 8 5.5 2.8 2 AGSECO 9001 -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 3.5 AGSECO Colby 94 -- -- -- -- -- 3.3 -- AWWPA (W) Rio Blanco -- -- -- -- 7.3 3 4.3 AWWPA (W) Oro Blanco 6 9 20S 7 7.3 3.3 4 Century II Discovery 8 9 trS 6 5.5 -- -- Century II Voyager -- -- -- -- -- 4.5 4.5 Century II (S) 2500 2 3 R 3 6.8 -- -- NK (S) Coker 9474 -- -- -- -- 4.3 -- -- NK (S) Coker 9543 -- -- -- -- 4.3 -- -- Ohlde (S) T441 1 2 R 1 3.8 -- -- Quantum XH1520 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Quantum XH1706 Exp -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Star Champ 5 9 trMR 7 -- -- -- Star Salute 5 9 R 6 -- -- -- Terra HR 153 -- -- -- -- 4.8 -- -- Terra (S) SR 204 -- -- -- -- 6.8 -- -- Terra (S) SR 205 -- -- -- -- 6.8 -- -- --- 2163 3 7 20MS 3 5.3 3.5 4 --- 2180 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4.8 --- Akron -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- --- Alliance -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- Arapahoe 4 7 trMR 4 -- 2 -- --- Arkan 7 9 20S 7 7 -- -- --- Cimarron 9 9 40S 8 6.5 2.3 3.8 --- Custer 4 9 R 6 4.8 3.3 3.8 --- Halt -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- --- Ike 8 9 40S 7 5.8 2.5 3 --- Jagger 2 4 R 2 6 4 3.8 --- Jules -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 -- --- Karl 8 9 60S 4 8 3.5 4.3 --- Karl 92 8 9 60S 4 8.3 2.8 3.8 --- KS91H153-2 4 9 R 4 6.3 3.8 4 --- KS92PO263-137 3 6 20MS 3 5.8 2.8 3.3 --- Larned 8 9 40S 8 8.5 4.8 -- --- Niobrara 6 9 20MS 8 -- 2 -- --- Newton 9 9 80S 8 8.5 4.3 4.5 --- Scout 66 9 9 30S 9 8.8 4.3 -- --- TAM 107 9 9 80S 5 8.3 4.5 4.5 --- TAM 200 -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 4.3 --- Tonkawa 6 9 R 7 6.5 3.5 4.3 --- Triumph 64 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- Vista 7 9 trMR 9 -- 2 -- --- Yuma -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 5.3 --- (S) Caldwell 4 7 trMS 3 7 -- -- --- (S) Cardinal 4 5 10MR 3 5.3 -- -- --- (S) Clark 3 7 trMR 3 5.8 -- -- --- (S) Ernie 5 8 30S 5 7 -- -- --- (S) Excel 3 7 R 4 5.5 -- -- --- (S) Freedom 5 7 trMR 4 6.5 -- -- --- (S) Jackson 4 7 10S 3 5.3 -- -- --- (S) MO12258Exp 4 6 trS 3 7.8 -- -- --- (W) Arlin 5 8 20MS 7 7.5 6.3 4.5 Test Average 5.2 7.5 -- 4.9 6.4 3.5 4.1 C.V. (%) -- -- -- -- -- 23 20.2 L.S.D.(0.05) -- -- -- -- 0.8 1 1 Unless otherwise indicated, ratings are on a 1-9 scale with 1 best and 9 poorest. These ratings are from individual tests and may not characterize the reaction of a variety under all circumstances. Several ratings have no C.V. or L.S.D. because they were unreplicated. \1 Green leaf duration, first note. A visual estimate of how well the flag leaf is holding up after anthesis. \2 Green leaf duration, second note. Examining both ratings provides a picture of how the leaves held up under disease pressure over time. \3 Rust; number quantifies leaf area affected as a percentage, letters characterize reaction: S = susceptible, MR = moderately resistant, etc. \4 Septoria tritici. \5 Barley yellow dwarf virus. \6 Freeze damage note taken 5/16, several weeks after a hard freeze on April 10-11.