1/
                 ARKANSAS SMALL-GRAIN CULTIVAR PERFORMANCE TESTS
                                     1993-94
                                                              2/
                   R. K. Bacon, J. T. Kelly, and C. E. Parsons
                                         
                                   INTRODUCTION
      
      Small-grain cultivar performance tests are conducted each year in
      Arkansas by the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department
      of Agronomy.  The tests provide information to companies developing
      cultivars and/or marketing seed within the state, and aid the Arkansas
      Cooperative Extension Service in formulating cultivar recommendations
      for small-grain producers.
      
      The 1993-94 tests were conducted at the Northeast Research and
      Extension Center at Keiser, the Vegetable Substation near Kibler, the
      Cotton Branch Station near Marianna, the Southeast Branch Station near
      Rohwer, the Rice Research and Extension Center near Stuttgart, and the
      Southwest Research and Extension Center at Hope.
      
      Two wheat tests were conducted at each location.  The STANDARD INPUT
      WHEAT TESTS and the HIGH INPUT WHEAT TESTS contained the same entries,
      and were treated identically with respect to cultural practices,
      except, the High Input Tests received more topdress nitrogen and a
      foliar fungicide application.  Specific location and cultural practice
      information accompanies each table.  This dual approach is utilized to
      give information on cultivar performance under the various production
      strategies employed by Arkansas farmers.
      
                                     METHODS
      
      Each wheat test contained 50 entries and each oat test contained 41
      entries.  A randomized complete block experimental design with four
      replications was used for all tests.  Seeding rates of 110 lbs/A for
      wheat and 64 lbs/A for oat were used to establish plots 15 feet in
      length and 49 inches in width (seven rows, seven inches apart).  Plots
      were end-trimmed,  and harvested with a plot combine.  At Hope the
      entire 15 ft plot was harvested.
      
      Characters evaluated
      --------------------
      Yield:  Yields were calculated from the weight of cleaned samples
      harvested from each plot and are expressed as bushels per acre (bu/A)
      at 13% moisture content.
      
      Test weight:  Test weights, expressed in pounds per bushel (lbs/bu),
      were determined using sub-samples from each plot with a DICKEY-john
      Model GAC II Grain Analysis Computer (DICKEY-john Corporation, Auburn,
      IL 62615).
      
      Lodging:  Lodging is reported as an estimated percentage of plants
      prostrate at maturity:  10 = 10% lodged; 100 = 100% lodged.  The
      lodging ratings are usually taken at harvest so many of the earlier
      maturing lines may have higher ratings since they may have been ready
      to harvest earlier.  Also high lodging scores are sometimes directly
      associated with more seeds per head or high grain yields.
      
      Heading Date:  Heading dates are reported as the day when an estimated
      50% of the heads had emerged.
      Maturity Date:  Maturity dates are reported as the day when an
      estimated 90% of the culms were yellow.
      
      Disease Ratings:  Disease infections were rated visually based on the
      percentage of leaf or glume area displaying symptoms.  Ratings for the
      tests at Kibler for glume blotch were made by Dr. Gene Milus,
      University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.  The ratings at Hope
      for percent armyworm damage were also made by Dr. Milus.
      
                                 WEATHER SUMMARY
      
      Field conditions were generally favorable for planting at all
      locations.  Although planting and emergence was a problem for many
      wheat growers this year most of the tests were planted before
      conditions became unfavorable.  Stands were somewhat thin at Marianna
      and Keiser due to the cool, wet conditions but were acceptable.
      Stands were excellent at all other locations.
      
      Seasonal rainfall was higher than normal at all six test sites.
      Precipitation from October through March, was above normal at all the
      locations.  During March and April the monthly rainfall totals were
      below normal except at Kibler where they were above normal in April.
      Monthly rainfall totals from October though May and departure from
      normal (30-year average) are given for each test.  Temperatures during
      the Spring were cooler than normal.
      
                                     RESULTS
      
      Grain yields were high for all the tests.  Dry, cool conditions during
      the Spring helped reduce the incidence of foliar diseases and insure
      good grain filling.  Yields of wheat cultivars at all locations are
      summarized in Tables 1 and 2.  Yields and other measurements and
      cultural practice and site information including precipitation
      summaries can be found in Tables 3-14.  The results from the oat tests
      are in Tables 15 and 16.  Due to the relatively dry conditions, only
      the standard input test at Kibler had a sufficient amount of foliar
      disease to be rated.
      
      Due to wet soil conditions, the stand establishment in the Keiser oat
      test was unacceptable and the test was abandoned.  Because there was
      also some water damage in both the standard and high input wheat tests
      at Keiser in the first replication, only 3 replications were
      harvested.
      
      NK Coker 9803 and NK Coker 9543 yields were not reported at Rohwer due
      to unacceptable stand densities.  The quality of the seed lot received
      from the company to plant the trials was very poor, resulting in
      visually noticeable stand problems at this location.  Although not
      obvious at other locations, stand establishment of these two entries
      may have been affected at other locations.
 
                                 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
      This research was funded in part by participating companies.  The
      assistance of the following individuals in conducting these
      experiments is gratefully acknowledged.
 
           Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
                      Mr. Lee Craig, Undergraduate Assistant
                    Mr. Danny Boothe, Undergraduate Assistant
                    Mr. Tully Hornor, Undergraduate Assistant
                     Ms. Marilynn Correll, Research Assistant
                   Ms. Greta Haustein, Undergraduate Assistant
                    Ms. Julie Barham, Undergraduate Assistant
                                         
       Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
                       Dr. Gene Milus, Assistant Professor
                                         
           Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, University of Arkansas,
                                   Fayetteville
                      Mr. Kevin Thompson, Research Associate
                                         
                 Northeast Research and Extension Center, Keiser
                         Dr. Tom Evrard, Center Director
                      Mr. Bobby Glover, Research Specialist
                                         
                           Vegetable Substation, Kibler
                       Mr. Dennis Motes, Resident Director
                        Mr. Steven Eaton, Research Specialist
                                           
                           Cotton Branch Station, Marianna
                          Mr. Bob Turner, Resident Director
                       Mr. Claude Kennedy, Research Specialist
                                           
                           Southeast Branch Station, Rohwer
                         Mr. Larry Earnest, Resident Director
                         Mr. Dan Halter, Research Specialist
                      Mr. Cliff Coker, Area Extension Specialist
                                           
                    Rice Research and Extension Center, Stuttgart
                          Dr. John Robinson, Center Director
                      Mr. P.A. Shockley, Jr., Research Assistant
                        Dr. John Bernhardt, Research Associate
                                           
                    Southwest Research and Extension Center, Hope
                      Dr. Mike Phillips, Acting Center Director
                      Dr. William Loe, Former Resident Director
                        Mr. David Barber, Research Specialist
                                         
      --------------------------------
      1/   Use of products and tradenames in this report does not constitute
           a guarantee or warranty of the products and does not signify that
           those products are approved to the exclusion of comparable
           products.
      
      2/   Professor and Research Associate, respectively, Department of
           Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, and
           Research Specialist, Strawberry Substation, P. O. Box 347, Bald
           Knob, AR 72010.