Some nuclei-cytoplasmic
combinations of barley substituted lines collection
change the productivity characteristics
I.M. Goloenko, A.A. Teljatnicova and
O.G. Davydenko
Institute of Genetics and Cytology, Belarus
Academy of Sciences,
Academicheskaya 27, Minsk, 220072, Belarus
The nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions
of iso- and alloplasmic barley lines were studied to determine the effect of
the cytoplasm on the agronomic traits. 30 substituted lines combined 5 nuclear
and 6 cytoplasmic genotypes, differing from each other at definite loci of
chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes (Sychjova et al.1998). The aim of the investigation
was to evaluate what definite rearrangements in the organelle DNA structure can
be responsible for the change of productivity genes expression.
In the
present research each group having the same nuclei and
varying cytoplasms were compared with their euplasmic form (Table 1). All the lines and their parent
cultivars were grown randomly in 3 repeats
in 1998. Agronomic
traits were measured following standard procedures. Data on 6 yield components
- plant height, spike number
/ plant, spike length, grain number/spike, grain number/plant, grain
weight/plant were collected. Analysis of variance revealed that depending on
definite nucleo-plasmic combination the
effects of cytoplasms were significant
for the various number of traits (from 1 to 5 characters) (Table 2, 3).
As a rule, introduction of both the inter- and intra- species cytoplasms more often had negative than positive consequences, but in some cases the positive changes of productivity can be also found ( Tsunewaki, 1980; Davydenko,1991). Our investigation also confirmed these facts. Cytoplasm substitution in four out of five groups (with Zazersky-85, Roland, Vezha, Vizit nuclear genomes) caused little or no positive changes in the level of productivity characters (Table 1). Nevertheless the combination of the majority of cytoplasms with nuclear genome of cultivar Gostinets resulted only in positive effects. Spike number/plant, spike length, grain number/spike, grain number/plant, grain weight/plant were increased in comparing with these characters of nuclear donor variety. Thus, cytoplasmic variability can be used in plant breeding.
References
I.M.Sychjova, S.O.Triboush, N.G.Danilenko, Davydenko O.G.The collection
of allo- and isoplasmic barley lines with PDRF-studied mitochondrial DNA // Barley Genetic
Newsletters. – 1998. – V. 28. – P.
9-11.
Tsunewaki K. Genetic diversity of the
cytoplasm in Triticum and Aegilops. - Japan, 1980. - P. 49-210.
Davydenko O.G. Cytoplasmic effect on expression of some morphological traits, transmission and mitotic recombination in
allo- and
isoplasmic
lines. Prof. Kihara Memorial Symposium on cytoplasmic
engineering in wheat. In book: Nuclear and organellar genomes of wheat species. Yokohama, Kihara
Memorial foundation, p. 214-222, 1991.
Table 1
Comparative morphological analysis of cultivars and their analogs - lines with
substituted cytoplasms
Cultivars, |
lines |
|
|
Characters |
|
|
|
|
Nucleus |
Cytoplasm |
Plant height |
Spike number / plant |
Spike length |
Grain number / spike |
Grain number / plant |
Grain weight / plant |
|
Zazersky-85 |
Zazersky-85 |
54,181 |
3,724 |
7,095 |
21,886 |
70,057 |
3,238 |
|
|
A |
57,886** |
3,800 |
6,733 |
20,943 |
67,514 |
3,130 |
|
|
L1 |
53,333 |
4,248 |
7,257 |
22,190 |
78,495 |
3,346 |
|
|
W3 |
58,486** |
4,467* |
7,543* |
22,371 |
83,429* |
3,696 |
|
|
W4 |
53,762 |
4,295 |
7,010 |
21,724 |
78,648 |
3,603 |
|
|
W5 |
56,467** |
4,210 |
7,276 |
22,895 |
78,114 |
3,520 |
|
|
W8 |
54,952 |
3,838 |
6,619** |
20,743 |
65,143 |
2,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cv.Roland |
cv.Roland |
62,02 |
4,43 |
7,40 |
22,10 |
83,84 |
3,42 |
|
|
A |
61,51 |
4.69 |
7,05 |
21,61 |
86,58 |
3,42 |
|
|
L1 |
67,03* |
4,78 |
7,50 |
22,41 |
92,70 |
4,01 |
|
|
W3 |
63,66 |
4,51 |
7,78 |
23,09 |
89,78 |
3,59 |
|
|
W4 |
65,72** |
4,51 |
7,61 |
22,31 |
89,71 |
3,69 |
|
|
W5 |
63,57 |
4,65 |
7,31 |
22,14 |
87,04 |
3,88 |
|
|
W8 |
67,98** |
4,87 |
7,58 |
23,33 |
92,49 |
4,11* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cv.Visit |
Visit |
63,152 |
4,438 |
7,267 |
23,133 |
89,238 |
4,253 |
|
|
A |
63,124 |
3,810* |
7,543 |
22,619 |
78,638 |
3,904 |
|
|
L1 |
70,295** |
4,219 |
7,476 |
22,076 |
78,552 |
3,987 |
|
|
W3 |
62,543 |
4,048 |
7,390 |
22,257 |
79,019 |
3,724 |
|
|
W4 |
62,943 |
4,324 |
7,210 |
22,400 |
84,038 |
3,890 |
|
|
W5 |
62,619 |
3,781* |
6,895 |
22,810 |
71,314** |
3,532* |
|
|
W8 |
63,257 |
4,571 |
7,610* |
22,733 |
86,600 |
4,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cv.Vezha |
Vezha |
52,914 |
2,876 |
5,276 |
33,514 |
81,410 |
3,167 |
|
|
A |
52,505 |
2,629 |
4,895* |
31,086 |
68,048* |
2,791 |
|
|
L1 |
49,343** |
2,533* |
4,971* |
31,476 |
65,181** |
2,666* |
|
|
W3 |
50,829** |
2,686 |
5,086 |
33,448 |
72,990 |
3,087 |
|
|
W4 |
50,314** |
2,733 |
5,086 |
32,886 |
76,457 |
3,252* |
|
|
W5 |
52,448 |
2,876 |
4,867* |
30,238* |
69,381* |
3,442 |
|
|
W8 |
52,057 |
2,905 |
5,057 |
34,581 |
82,819 |
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cv.Gostinets |
Gostinets |
52,124 |
4,733 |
6,610 |
18,438 |
61,724 |
2,767 |
|
|
A |
56,800** |
6,410** |
7,467** |
21,362** |
90,429** |
4,149** |
|
|
L1 |
60,829** |
5,057 |
7,048* |
19,924* |
76,800* |
3,521** |
|
|
W3 |
55,705** |
5,429 |
7,524** |
21,952** |
85,695** |
3,715** |
|
|
W4 |
57,905** |
4,371 |
7,381** |
19,962* |
70,314 |
3,568** |
|
|
W5 |
60,943** |
4,524 |
7,286** |
21,181** |
73,371* |
3,470** |
|
|
W8 |
55,276** |
4,429 |
6,733 |
18,962 |
65,448 |
2,918 |
|
Variations
are singificant at: * – Р<0,05;
** – Р<0,01
Table
2: The fraction of effect of the cytoplasm and environment on productivity
characters in substitution barley lines
Nucleus, |
F-criterion |
The fraction of effect (%) |
|||||
character |
Cyto-plasm |
Environ-ment |
Interaction |
Cyto-plasm |
Environ-ment |
Interaction |
Residual |
cv. Zazersky-85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant height |
10,57** |
52,55** |
2,22** |
7,03 |
11,64 |
2,95 |
75,33 |
Spike number/plant |
1,89 |
6,06** |
0,86 |
1,51 |
1,61 |
1,37 |
90,2 |
Spike length |
5,82** |
4,35* |
1,73 |
4,52 |
1,71 |
2,68 |
88,07 |
Grain number /spike |
2,54* |
4,30* |
1,65 |
2,02 |
1,14 |
2,64 |
90,34 |
Grain number/plant |
2,47* |
0,92 |
1,40 |
1,98 |
0,25 |
2,25 |
91,02 |
Grain weight/plant |
1,68 |
2,31 |
1,39 |
1,36 |
0,62 |
2,25 |
91,86 |
cv. Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant height |
13,69** |
73,42** |
2,29** |
10,04 |
15,07 |
15,51 |
70,86 |
Spike number/plant |
0,43 |
10,01** |
1,54 |
0,34 |
2,65 |
2,44 |
89,90 |
Spike length |
2,41* |
24,70** |
1,33 |
1,82 |
6,24 |
2,02 |
85,88 |
Grain number /spike |
0,93 |
13,95** |
2,44** |
0,72 |
3,63 |
3,82 |
88,51 |
Grain number/plant |
0,40 |
14,43** |
1,24 |
0,31 |
3,76 |
1,94 |
88,58 |
Grain weight/plant |
1,45 |
11,62** |
1,81* |
1,13 |
3,03 |
2,82 |
88,54 |
cv. Bezha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant height |
12,46** |
0,91 |
24,63** |
6,80 |
0,17 |
26,88 |
61,83 |
Spike number/plant |
1,33 |
3,02* |
0,69 |
1,07 |
0,81 |
1,11 |
91,04 |
Spike length |
1,38 |
15,75** |
0,99 |
1,08 |
4,09 |
1,55 |
88,28 |
Grain number /spike |
2,29* |
12,19** |
0,7 |
1,80 |
3,20 |
1,10 |
89,28 |
Grain number/plant |
2,75* |
0,14 |
0,97 |
2,20 |
0,04 |
1,55 |
90,50 |
Grain weight/plant |
1,56 |
1,28 |
1,24 |
1,26 |
0,34 |
2,00 |
91,31 |
cv.Vizit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant height |
26,76** |
36,25* |
7,31** |
15,51 |
7,00 |
8,47 |
65,69 |
Spike number/plant |
2,25* |
0,82 |
1,46 |
1,78 |
0,22 |
2,32 |
89,92 |
Spike length |
3,27** |
1,79 |
2,51** |
2,54 |
0,47 |
3,91 |
88,25 |
Grain number /spike |
1,25 |
2,58 |
3,49** |
0,98 |
0,67 |
5,46 |
88,67 |
Grain number/plant |
1,85 |
1,65 |
1,59 |
1,46 |
0,43 |
2,52 |
89,72 |
Grain weight/plant |
1,11 |
1,20 |
2,01* |
0,88 |
0,32 |
3,19 |
90,21 |
cv. Gostinets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant height |
32,91** |
120,86** |
12,00** |
15,23 |
18,64 |
11,11 |
52,44 |
Spike number/plant |
8,24** |
17,62** |
2,72** |
5,99 |
4,27 |
3,96 |
82,37 |
Spike length |
7,57** |
7,63** |
1,47 |
5,62 |
1,89 |
2,19 |
84,09 |
Grain number /spike |
8,65** |
6,07** |
2,47** |
6,26 |
1,46 |
3,58 |
81,96 |
Grain number/plant |
6,49** |
4,85** |
1,18 |
5,01 |
1,25 |
1,82 |
87,43 |
Grain weight/plant |
6,37** |
4,17* |
1,64 |
4,92 |
1,07 |
2,53 |
87,48 |
Components
of variation are singificant at:
* – Р<0,05;
** – Р<0,01
Table
3: The fraction of effect of the nucleus and cytoplasm on productivity characters in substitution
barley lines
Character |
F-criterion |
The fraction of effect |
|||||
|
Nucleus |
Cytoplasm |
Interaction |
Nucleus |
Cytoplasm |
Interaction |
Residual |
Plant height |
598,70** |
13,95** |
16,78** |
34,98 |
1,22 |
5,88 |
51,65 |
Spike number/plant |
108,45** |
1,06 |
3,76** |
10,45 |
0,15 |
2,17 |
85,21 |
Spike length |
375,78** |
4,24** |
3,85** |
28,48 |
0,48 |
1,75 |
67,00 |
Grain number /spike |
436,00** |
1,73 |
2,88 |
31,97 |
0,19 |
1,27 |
64,81 |
Grain number/plant |
14,49** |
0,99 |
2,38** |
1,53 |
0,16 |
1,80 |
93,49 |
Grain weight/plant |
15,76** |
0,69 |
2,53** |
1,66 |
0,11 |
1,60 |
93,21 |
Components
of variation are singificant at: *
– Р<0,05; ** – Р<0,01