Bowman backcross derived lines from entries in the barley semidwarf collection, which exhibited several brachytic traits (Franckowiak and Pecio, 1992), were plant in the 1994 spring greenhouse nursery (Table 1). These lines were used because the original stocks included both spring and winter barley cultivars and showed variable responses to photoperiod. Nearly all of the selected lines had a short blade on the first true leaf. Reduced plant height, coiled neck, long basal rachis internode, short awn, and short kernel were observed in some, but not all lines.
Lines having similar phenotypes were noted and few crosses were made to determine allelism. The F1 progenies in which the plants exhibited brachytic characteristics and provided evidence for allelism are listed in Table 2. The results show that DWS1038, DWS1224, and FN53 each have a mutant gene at the br1 locus. The ari-l.3 gene is the mutant in the breviaristatum series of loci which is allelic at the br2 locus. The DWS1002 and DWS1230 stocks contain brachytic mutants which are alleles. The mutants in the DWS1036 and DWS1037 stocks are alleles. Allelism between these two groups was not tested. However, neither is allelic at the br1 locus (Table 2). The crosses, which are needed to demonstrate that these mutants represent new loci, have not been made.
References
Boulger, M.C., R.G. Sears, and W.E. Kronstad. 1982. An investigation of the association between dwarfing sources and gibberellic acid response in barley. Barley Genet. IV:550-553.
Franckowiak, J.D., and A. Pecio. 1992. Coordinator's report: Semidwarf genes: A listing of genetic stocks. BGN 21:116-127.
Table 1. A list of mutants from the barley semidwarf collection placed in the brachytic phenotypic class.
ıAllele symbols recommended for mutants in the brachytic class of
semidwarf genes. A period is use to separate the locus and allele portions of
the gene symdol. If the br symbol is followed by a number, the mutant
gene is assigned to a specific locus. If it is not, adequate allelism testing
has not been completed to assign the mutant gene to a specific locus.
Powers, L. 1936. The nature of the interactions of genes affecting four quantitative characters in a cross between Hordeum deficiens and vulgare. Genetics 21:398-420.
Stoy, V., and A. Hagberg. 1967. Effects of growth regulators on ear density mutants in barley. Hereditas 58:359-384.
Tsuchiya, T. 1980. BGS157. Brachytic 2, br2 (revised). BGN 10:115.
Tsuchiya, T. 1974. Allelic relationships of genes for short-awned mutants in barley. BGN 4:80-81
Tsuchiya, T. 1976. Allelism testing of genes between brachytic and erectoides mutants. BGN 6:79-81.
Table 2. Crosses among selected lines to determine allelism among mutant genes which control the brachytic growth habit.
_________________________________________________________ Female Male Allele symbolsı No. of Phenotype parent parent ________________ plants of F1 plants Male Female _________________________________________________________ DWS1078 FN53 br1.a br1.ae 15 Brachytic DWS1132 DWS1038 ari-i.38² br1.t 11 Brachytic DWS1132 DWS1224 ari-i.38 br1.x 15 Brachytic DWS1136 DWS1152 ari-m.28 br1.e 9 Normal DWS1079 DWS1136 br2.b ari-m.28 9 Normal DWS1135 DWS1079 ari-l.3 br2.b 18 Brachytic DWS1002 DWS1132 br.g ari-i.38 9 Normal DWS1002 DWS1230 br.g br.y 15 Brachytic DWS1036 DWS1037 br.r br.s 8 Brachytic DWS1036 DWS1152 br.r br1.e 9 Normal __________________________________________________________ıThe recommended allele symbols are listed in Table 1 and are modified to indicate the results of the crosses considered in this report.
²Positive allelism tests for the ari-i.38 and br1.e mutants at the br1 locus were eported by Tsuchiya (1974) and Szarejko and Maluszynski (1984), respectively.