| INTRODUCTION | ||||||||||
| The 2013 Uniform Midseason Oat Performance Nursery was grown at 15 locations in 8 states | ||||||||||
| and 4 Canadian provinces. Agronomic data collected at Aberdeen, Idaho, and Lacombe, Alberta, | ||||||||||
| are presented but not included in the overall nursery averages because these locations are out | ||||||||||
| of the range of normal adaptation. Single rep data from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, are presented | ||||||||||
| in a separate table (Table 25). The nursery was not grown at the South Dakota locations this year | ||||||||||
| due to a transition in project leadership. | ||||||||||
| The "Comments on Growing Conditions" provide some insights on performance at the various | ||||||||||
| locations. The 2013 nursery average yield of 122.7 bu/A was well above the 2012 nursery average | ||||||||||
| of 105.1 bu/A and the 2011 average of 90.0 bu/A due to some very favorable growing conditions at | ||||||||||
| several locations. Winnipeg had an excellent yield average of 213.7 bu/A and Minot and Fargo had | ||||||||||
| high averages of 157.5 and 151.8 bu/A. In contrast, Carrington had a low average of only 57.2 bu/A | ||||||||||
| due to hot, dry conditions. Crown rust pressure was reported at St. Paul and West Lafayette | ||||||||||
| locations and lodging at West Lafayette and Urbana. | ||||||||||
| The highest yielding entry was SD111939 with an average yield of 143.5 bu/A. It was also highest | ||||||||||
| in test weight. Sister line entries of this line were also high in yield and test weight, but it and most | ||||||||||
| of its sib lines were low in lodging resistance. The two Aberdeen, Idaho, entries performed well in | ||||||||||
| the highly favorable conditions at the the Canadian locations of Winnipeg and Lacombe, although | ||||||||||
| not so well in the other locations. | ||||||||||
| Coefficient of Variation (CV) and Least Significant Difference (LSD) values for yield are provided | ||||||||||
| for each location in Table 5 ‘Average yield (bu/A), yield, and rank at stations reporting the | ||||||||||
| 2013 UMOPN’. These values were either supplied by the cooperator or calculated using the | ||||||||||
| individual plot data submitted by the cooperator. This information plus the listing of ‘Plot Data’ | ||||||||||
| and ‘Comments on Growing Conditions’ at individual locations should help in interpreting the results. | ||||||||||
| A list of recently released cultivars including state or program of origin, assigned name, | ||||||||||
| experimental line number in testing, nurseries tested in, and pedigree can be found in | ||||||||||
| Appendix C. This list, in addition to being included in the annual nursery reports, is to be | ||||||||||
| maintained in an updated fashion on a GrainGenes website: | ||||||||||
| (link at http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/oat.shtml). | ||||||||||
| We wish to thank Mitchell Wise and Laurie Herrin, USDA Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, | ||||||||||
| WI, for analyses of groat protein, beta-glucan, and oil percentages, and Roger Caspers, University | ||||||||||
| of Minnesota, for groat percent determinations. | ||||||||||
| This report and past years' reports are available at: | ||||||||||
| http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/UE-MOPN.html | ||||||||||