|
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2013 Uniform
Midseason Oat Performance Nursery was grown at 15 locations in 8 states |
|
|
and 4 Canadian
provinces. Agronomic data collected at
Aberdeen, Idaho, and Lacombe, Alberta, |
|
|
are presented but not
included in the overall nursery averages because these locations are out |
|
|
of the range of normal
adaptation. Single rep data from
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, are presented |
|
|
in a separate table
(Table 25). The nursery was not grown
at the South Dakota locations this year |
|
|
due to a transition in
project leadership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Comments on
Growing Conditions" provide some insights on performance at the
various |
|
|
locations. The 2013 nursery average yield of 122.7
bu/A was well above the 2012 nursery average |
|
|
of 105.1 bu/A and the
2011 average of 90.0 bu/A due to some very favorable growing conditions
at |
|
|
several locations. Winnipeg had an excellent yield average of
213.7 bu/A and Minot and Fargo had |
|
high averages of 157.5
and 151.8 bu/A. In contrast,
Carrington had a low average of only 57.2 bu/A |
|
due to hot, dry
conditions. Crown rust pressure was
reported at St. Paul and West Lafayette |
|
|
locations and lodging at
West Lafayette and Urbana. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The highest yielding
entry was SD111939 with an average
yield of 143.5 bu/A. It was also
highest |
|
in test weight. Sister line entries of this line were also
high in yield and test weight, but it and most |
|
of its sib lines were low
in lodging resistance. The two Aberdeen, Idaho, entries performed well in |
|
|
the highly favorable
conditions at the the Canadian locations of Winnipeg and Lacombe,
although |
|
|
not so well in the other
locations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficient of Variation
(CV) and Least Significant Difference (LSD) values for yield are provided |
|
|
for each location in
Table 5 ‘Average yield (bu/A), yield, and rank at stations reporting the |
|
|
2013 UMOPN’. These values were either supplied by the
cooperator or calculated using the |
|
|
individual plot data
submitted by the cooperator. This
information plus the listing of ‘Plot Data’ |
|
|
and ‘Comments on Growing
Conditions’ at individual locations should help in interpreting the results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A list of recently
released cultivars including state or program of origin, assigned name, |
|
|
|
experimental line number
in testing, nurseries tested in, and pedigree can be found in |
|
|
|
Appendix C. This list, in addition to being included in
the annual nursery reports, is to be |
|
|
maintained in an updated
fashion on a GrainGenes website: |
|
|
|
|
|
(link at
http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/oat.shtml). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We wish to thank Mitchell
Wise and Laurie Herrin, USDA Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, |
|
|
WI, for analyses of groat
protein, beta-glucan, and oil percentages, and Roger Caspers, University |
|
|
of Minnesota, for groat
percent determinations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report and past
years' reports are available at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/UE-MOPN.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|