|
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2012 Uniform
Midseason Oat Performance Nursery was grown at 17 locations in 9 states |
|
|
and 4 Canadian
provinces. Agronomic data collected at
Aberdeen, Idaho, and Lacombe, Alberta, |
|
|
are presented but not
included in the overall nursery averages because these locations are out |
|
|
of the range of normal
adaptation. Single rep data from
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, are presented |
|
|
in a separate table
(Table 25). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Comments on
Growing Conditions" provide some insights on performance at the
various |
|
|
locations. The 2012 nursery average yield of 105.1
bu/A was above the 2011 nursery average of |
|
|
90.0 bu/A but lower than
the average in 2010 of 117.7 bu/A.
There was a large variation in yield |
|
|
among locations. A very low yield average at Madison,
Wisconsin, of 51.0 bu/A and reduced |
|
|
yields and seed quality
at several other locations were attributed to hot, dry conditions during |
|
|
grain fill. West Lafayette, Indiana, with the highest
yield average of 179.7 bu/A, apparently |
|
|
escaped the heat effects
due to early planting. Because of the
onset of hot, dry conditions at |
|
|
many locations, earlier
heading entries in general did better than later heading ones. A notable |
|
|
exception was at Minot,
North Dakota, where the latest heading entry was the highest yielding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The highest yielding
entry was P0216A1-1-45 with an average yield of 127.3 bu/A, but it was also |
|
|
among the lowest in groat
percent at the 5 locations where seed samples were analyzed. The |
|
|
second highest yielding
entry, SD10127 at 123.9 bu/A, also was the highest entry in test weight, |
|
|
but it was among the
worst in lodging. The lowest ranking
entry in overall yield average was the |
|
|
very late heading entry
OT2074, but it was the highest yielding entry at Minot, North Dakota. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficient of Variation
(CV) and Least Significant Difference (LSD) values for yield are provided |
|
|
for each location in
Table 5 ‘Average yield (bu/A), yield, and rank at stations reporting the |
|
|
2012 UMOPN’. These values were either supplied by the
cooperator or calculated using the |
|
|
individual plot data
submitted by the cooperator. This
information plus the listing of ‘Plot Data’ |
|
|
and ‘Comments on Growing
Conditions’ at individual locations should help in interpreting the results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A list of recently
released cultivars including state or program of origin, assigned name, |
|
|
|
experimental line number
in testing, nurseries tested in, and pedigree can be found in |
|
|
|
Appendix C. This list, in addition to being included in
the annual nursery reports, is to be |
|
|
maintained in an updated
fashion on a GrainGenes website: |
|
|
|
|
|
(link at
http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/oat.shtml). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We wish to thank Mitchell
Wise and Laurie Herrin, USDA Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, |
|
|
WI, for analyses of groat
protein, beta-glucan, and oil percentages, and Roger Caspers, University |
|
|
of Minnesota, for groat
percent determinations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report and past
years' reports are available at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/Avena/UE-MOPN.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|