VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC
INSTITUTE AND
Department
of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences,
Winter
Barley Production and Research in 2009
.
Growing Conditions: Planting conditions in fall 2008 were
favorable for early planting with over 20% of the state’s intended acreage
seeded by October 20. The high cost of
inputs influenced some growers to plant later than normal in hopes that prices
would fall or fields were seeded with the intention of applying fertilizer at a
later date. By November 1, 49% of the
crop was estimated as planted which matched the 5-yr average of 50% planted by this
date. Widespread rain in November provided
moisture and improved groundwater supplies in many areas. While most small grain fields looked good,
cool weather in November slowed crop development. Mid-winter was cooler than normal and dry, with most of the Coastal Plain region receiving 2 inches
less precipitation than the long term average in the month of January. By February this deficit was more than 4
inches and resulted in only 26% of the small grain crop rated as good or
excellent. Rain in March helped make up
some of this deficit and over 50% of the crop was rated good or better in
mid-April. In May, cool, wet weather had
many producers scouting fields for disease and making pesticide applications in
response to threats. By the end of the
month the crop was headed, but continued wet weather caused producers to be
concerned over the potential for Fusarium Head Blight
(FHB) as well as potential decreases in test weight due to weathering. By June 20, approximately 20% of the crop was
harvested which was significantly lower than the previous year when 44% was
harvested by that date.
Diseases: For the past three years the most widespread
diseases were leaf rust (Puccinia hordei),
and net blotch (Pyrenophora teres). Severity was rated on a 0 to 9 scale with 0
being no symptoms present and 9 being near total leaf coverage. Leaf rust ranged from 1 to 7 in the hulless test with an average rating of 4. In the hulled test, leaf rust ranged from 0
to 6 with an average rating of 3. Net blotch received an average rating of 4 in the hulless test, while in the
hulled test an average rating of 3 was
observed. In both the hulless and hulled
tests net blotch ratings ranged from 1 to 7.
Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis(DC.) E.O. Speer f. sp. hordei Em. Marchal) infection was
present in some hulless lines, but most received a rating of 3 or lower and the
overall average rating was 1. Powdery
mildew was very light in the hulled test with the exception of Thoroughbred
which received a rating of 6.
Production: According to the United States Department of
Agriculture National Agriculture Statistical service
(http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Virginia/index.asp) in 2009
State Variety Tests: In 2009 there were 30 hulless barley entries
planted at four locations (
Barley Research and
Outlook for 2010: The
Virginia Tech barley breeding program will continue to develop and improve yield
potential and end use quality of new barley lines derived from crosses made
between superior hulled breeding lines and cultivars, such as Thoroughbred, with
outstanding hulless lines. Other
breeding populations derived from crosses with barley lines introduced from
various sources, including lines from the Barley Coordinated Agricultural
Project (Barley CAP) are being advanced in the program. This season (2009-2010), two advanced hulless
Thoroughbred progeny (VA05H-147 and VA06H-25) and two hulled (VA06B-48 and
VA06B-19) barley lines were grown in strips at the Virginia Crop improvement
Association’s Foundation Seed Farm as potential release candidates. These elite barley lines have improved grain
yield potential across a broad range of production conditions, and have
excellent seed qualities. These advanced
lines were evaluated in the Uniform Winter Barley Yield Nursery and the
Virginia Tech State Barley Variety Trial; if results are favorable, these lines
will be proposed for release in 2011. Last
spring (2009), we made over 450 crosses in the greenhouse comprised of hulled
and hulless barley parents. In fall of
2009, we planted F1 progeny (341) from 450 crosses made in 2008, and
F2 progeny (511) from 560 crosses made in 2007. Barley lines that are in the advance stages of
testing show a great deal of promise with respect to agronomic
performance. Many lines have improved
yield, straw strength and grain plumpness and have better resistance to
diseases (eg. leaf rust, powdery mildew, net blotch,
scab and scald).
In addition, yield drag of hulless barley
continues to be one of the major challenges facing hulless barley production in
the
Performance data for an
over years (2007, 2008, 2009) analysis of entries in Virginia Tech’s State
Barley Variety trial was compiled. VA05H-147 had the
highest average grain yield (3870 kg/ha), which was 65 kg/ha higher than that
of Doyce (3010 kg/ha) and 484 kg/ha higher than Eve (3386 kg/ha). Dan ranked 2nd in grain yield with
average grain yield of 3548 kg/ha, that was 323 kg/ha higher than that of Doyce
and 161 kg/ha higher than Eve. Dan also
had the highest average test weight (762 kg m-3) that was 81 kg m-3
higher than Doyce (681 kg m-3) and 26 kg m-3 higher
than Eve (736 kg m-3).
Osage
Bio Energy’s commitment and construction of a barley-based ethanol and
protein-feed production plant that has capacity to utilize 24 million bushels
of barley per year provides promise for an initial market for winter barley in
the