VIRGINIA
Winter Barley
Production and Research in 2008
W.S. Brooks,
M.E. Vaughn, C.A. Griffey, W.E Thomason, J. E. Seago, and E.G. Hokanson
VIRGINIA
POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department of
Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Blacksburg, VA 24060, U.S.A.
Growing Conditions.
Fall of 2007 presented challenging planting conditions for
many growers due to dry soil conditions with over half the state reported to be
very short of soil moisture. Growers
needing to perform primary tillage waited for rain while some small grain was
planted into these dry seedbeds. Rains
in late October improved conditions dramatically and by the end of the first
week of November, wheat planting reached 53 percent of intended acres, which is
the same as the five year average. Early
winter was relatively dry and while there were still concerns over subsoil
moisture, most of the small grain crop was rated good or better. Warm and favorable conditions in April
resulted in wheat heading approximately 5 days earlier than the long term
average. However, generally cool
conditions in May resulted in longer grain fill and harvest that was on
time. These cool conditions during grain
fill helped produce plump kernel and generally good yields across the
Commonwealth.
Diseases.
Disease severity was rated on a 0 to 9 scale with 0 being no disease
present and 9 being the leaf nearly covered.
Like the previous year the two most widespread diseases were leaf rust (Puccinia hordei) and net blotch (Pyrenophora teres). In the hulless test leaf rust ranged from 1-7
with an overall average of 4 and in the hulled test ranged from 1-6 an overall
average of 3. Net blotch ranged from 2-7
in the hulless test with an overall average of 5 and in the hulled test net
blotch ranged from 2-6 with an overall average of 3. Powdery Mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) was seen in the hulless test and
ranged from 0-7 with an overall of 3, but only a few entries in the hulled test
showed signs of powdery mildew.
Production.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture National
Agriculture Statistical Service in 2008 Virginia producers planted on 63,000
acres (25515 ha), up 15,000 acres (6,075 ha) from 2007. The estimated area harvested was 36,000 acres
(14580 ha), an increase of 6,000 acres (2,430 ha) over the previous year. 2008 saw a 20% increase in yield and went
from 71 bu/ac (3,816 kg/ha) in 2007 to 85 bu/ac (4,569 kg/ha). Barley production was estimated to be 3.6
million bushels.
State Variety Tests.
In 2008 there were 64 entries grown at six locations across the state of
Virginia.
In
the hulless test there were 32 entries, three of which were released
cultivars. Average yields ranged from 58
bu/ac (3,118 kg/ha) to 91 bu/ac (4,892 kg/ha) with an overall average of 75
bu/ac (4,032 kg/ha). Eve was the highest
yielding hulless cultivar with an average of 76 bu/ac (4,085 kg/ha). With an average of 91 bu/ac (4,892 kg/ha) the
experimental line, VA06H-25 had the highest yield in the hulless test. The test weights ranged from 53.1 lb/bu (684
kg/m3) to 60.1 lb/bu (773 kg/m3) with an overall average
of 57.6 lb/bu (741 kg/m3). In
the hulled test there were 32 entries, six of which were released
cultivars. Average yield ranged from 79
bu/ac (4,247 kg/ha) to 104 bu/ac (5,590 kg/ha) with an overall average of 95
bu/ac (5,106 kg/ha). Callao was the
highest yielding hulled cultivar, averaging 101 bu/ac (5,429 kg/ha). The highest yielding hulled line was the
experimental line VA06B-48 with an average of 104 bu/ac (5,590 kg/ha). Test weights ranged from 43.6 lb/bu (562 kg/m3)
to 47.1 lb/bu (606 kg/m3) and an overall average of 45.9 lb/bu (591
kg/m3).
Barley Research and
Outlook for 2009.
Since
2003, two hulled (Thoroughbred and Price) and two hulless (Doyce and Eve)
winter barley varieties have been released from the Virginia Tech barley
breeding program. Significant progress continues to be made in the development
of high value winter barley lines. We have developed elite barley lines having
potential for use in multiple end-use markets. However, the yield advantage of
the hulled cultivars over our currently available hulless cultivars has
hindered adoption and production of hulless barley in the mid-Atlantic region.
Therefore, our current focus is on the development of novel germplasm resources
that will provide a better understanding of the genetic basis of yield
potential in both hulless and hulled barley lines. Improving the yield
potential of hulless barley, with its superior grain composition and nutritional
quality, will have several practical benefit to producers and end users.
Meanwhile,
we are pleased to report the release of ‘Dan’ winter hulless barley (tested as
VA03H-61) as the third winter hulless barley developed by the Virginia Tech
barley breeding program. Dan hulless barley was named in recognition of Dr. Dan
E. Brann Professor Emeritus and former grain specialist at Virginia Tech. Dr.
Brann’s enthusiasm, insight, and support of barley production, improvement, and
expanded utilization in both traditional and new markets, continues to
contribute to barley’s success in the Eastern United States. DAN is a short
stature, full season, long awned, six-row winter hulless barley having good
winter hardiness, straw strength, and very high test weight and grain starch
concentration. Average grain yield of
Dan is excellent, compare to winter hulless cultivars Doyce and Eve. In
Virginia, average grain yield of Dan over three years (2006-2008) was 323-376
kg/ha-1 higher than those of Eve and Doyce. Average volume weight of
Dan which was 77 kg/hL-1 also was significantly higher than those of
Eve and Doyce. In the Uniform barley yield nurseries conducted in 2007-2008 in
4-5 states, Dan ranked 1st in both grain yield and volume weight
among hulless entries. In these nurseries average volume weight of Dan exceeded
those of Doyce and Eve. Based on grain compositional analyses conducted by the
USDA-ARS lab in Pennsylvania, average starch concentration of Dan (66%) was 4%
higher than Doyce, 6% higher than Eve and 5% higher than the hulled cultivar
Thoroughbred.
This
season (2008-2009), we will advance over 600 barley populations and evaluate
over 400 pure lines in yield tests and select pure lines among nearly 12,000
headrows. Fifty-two elite barley lines are being evaluated in state variety
trials at five locations in Virginia and at 1-2 locations in other cooperating
states. An additional 100 advanced hulless barley lines are being evaluated in
five states (Maryland, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia).
During
the past three years (2006-2008), our program continues to collaborate with
other barley breeding programs around the country via implementation of the
USDA-CSREES Barley Coordinated Agricultural Project (Barley CAP) grant. This
cooperative project involving 10 barley breeding programs around the country is
evaluating, genetically characterizing and mapping over 40 targeted traits in
barley breeding lines. This collaboration allows us to send 96 of our advance
barley lines to be evaluated with barley lines from 9 other breeding programs
for DNA markers located throughout the genome and also these lines will be
evaluated in field tests for important traits of interest. The combined efforts
of this project will afford barley breeders with new opportunities to gather
and share valuable information and resources, such as germplasm, mapping
technology, and genetic markers for a vast number of traits including
yield. The Virginia Tech barley breeding
program is the only program in the eastern U.S. collaborating in this
research. The marker data and field data
for barley lines from all breeding programs will be analyzed together using
association mapping, which will allow for the identification of specific
chromosomes or chromosome regions responsible for or controlling specific
traits of interest. Our program role in this grant is that we will screen the
96 barley lines sent from each breeding program for reaction to two separate
races of barley leaf rust, a significant disease of barley in Virginia and one
isolate of powdery mildew.
Given
the renewed interest in barley exports and new demands (30 million bushels per
year) for winter barley for use in ethanol production, our program now has
increased demands for developing and providing growers and end users with
superior cultivars having high yields and desirable quality; since the
byproduct dried distillers grain with soluble (DDGS) from ethanol production is
rapidly becoming a significant source of nutrient-rich food and feed products. Our efforts will continue toward the
development of high yielding hulled and hulless barley varieties for specific
end-use markets benefiting producers in the mid-Atlantic Region.