Barley Rusts in the United States in 1997
D.L. Long1, B.J. Steffenson2, K.J. Leonard1,
M.E. Hughes1 and D.H. Casper1
1Cereal Disease Laboratory, USDA-ARS and 2Department
of
Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University
Losses to barley stem rust were light in 1997 (Table 1).
Leaf rust (Puccinia hordei). During the first week in April, leaf rust severities of trace to 10% were observed on the lower leaves of barley in southern and central Texas plots. Trace rust severities were observed in barley plots in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California (Merced County) and in the Yuma, Arizona area. Rust severities from 10-40% developed on barley in this region of California by mid-May and in Virginia, traces of leaf rust were found in barley nurseries.
In late May, light amounts of barley leaf rust were reported in south central Pennsylvania and in the Skagit Valley of western Washington on winter barleys. By the second week in June, barley leaf rust was moderate to severe, and in early July, it was severe on susceptible fall-planted and spring-planted cultivars in the varietal plots in the Skagit Valley.
In mid-July, leaf rust severities of trace to 40% were observed in barley plots in west central Minnesota and northeastern South Dakota; however, no leaf rust was found in commercial fields. Leaf rust developed relatively late on barley in North Dakota. In mid-August, leaf rust severities ranged from trace to 25% in commercial fields in north central North Dakota. At Langdon, some late maturing lines had a rust severity of 60% in early September.
Twelve differential barley genotypes were used to identify races of P. hordei (Table 2). These races were designated according to a system similar to that of Roelfs and Martens (Phytopathology 78:526-533) as shown in Table 3. Ten races of barley leaf rust were identified from 24 collections in 1997 (Table 4). The most common races were race RHD (20%, Arizona and North Dakota), MCD (20%, California, North Dakota, and Virginia), and MCJ (14%, North Dakota). These results are similar to those observed in 1996, where races RHD and MCJ were most common.
In 1997, losses to barley leaf rust were light in the U.S. (Table 1).
Stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. hordei). In early March, ôhot spots ô of barley stripe rust were observed in nurseries and variety strip tests on the UC Davis agronomy farm in Davis California. By the first week of April, barley stripe rust was severe on the Davis campus and Yolo county plots in California. During the second week in April, barley stripe rust was present in light to severe amounts in commercial fields in the San Joaquin Valley of California. In some fields, the infections were lighter than in 1996, but in other fields, 20% severities were observed on flag leaves. Barley stripe rust appeared to increase even under dry conditions. During late April, barley stripe rust was widespread in CaliforniaÆs fall-sown spring barley crop. Some advanced lines that exhibited low rust severities last season were susceptible in 1997. Many of the commercial cultivars are extremely susceptible to stripe rust, while UC 603 exhibited a high level of tolerance. By early July, stripe rust on barley was appearing on spring-sown barley in the intermountain area of northeastern California. Severities of 80-100% were reported in northeastern California nurseries, and in commercial fields 100% severities were reported on flag leaves at the milk stage of development. Many fields in this area were sprayed with Folicur to control the rust. Except for northeastern California, total crop damage was less than in 1996, since stripe rust onset was late this season and crop development was earlier.
In early March, barley stripe rust was found in winter barley plots at Corvallis, Oregon. By late March, stripe rust pustules were found at low levels in susceptible cultivars within a 16 m diameter circle of the original infected plots, and by mid-April, barley was heavily infected with stripe rust in winter trial plots at Corvallis. During the last two weeks of April, cool, wet weather slowed stripe rust development in winter barley plots, but in late May, barley stripe rust was increasing in spring barley plots at Corvallis.
In late April, stripe rust severities of 20% were reported on the lower leaves of winter barley growing in the Skagit Valley of western Washington, and by late May the rust was severe. By the first week in July, barley stripe rust was severe on susceptible fall-planted and spring-planted cultivars growing in varietal plots in the Skagit Valley. In early July, light amounts of barley stripe rust were detected in the Palouse region of Washington and Idaho.
In mid-July, severities of 70% were observed in spring barley test plots in west central Idaho, while traces were found in the northern tip of Idaho. Since the plants were in an advanced plant growth stage, the rust did not significantly affect the yield.
Barley stripe rust is now firmly established in California and the Pacific Northwest, where the climate is most favorable for its development. Losses to barley stripe rust occurred in fields throughout California and the Pacific Northwest. In 1997, 20, 4, 0.5 and 0.1% losses to barley stripe rust occurred in California, Oregon, Washington and Idaho, respectively (Table 1).
Crown rust (Puccinia coronata). In mid-June, crown rust severities
of up to 15% were observed on barley lines growing 15 meters from Rhamnus
plants in a nursery at Casselton, North Dakota. Barley crown rust was found
in several commercial fields in trace amounts in the Red River Valley region
in mid-August. Crown rust reached 80% severity on susceptible barley cultivars
planted in an east central South Dakota nursery. Losses in barley to crown
rust were negligible in 1997.
Table 1. Estimated losses in barley due to rust in 1997
Losses due to | |||||||||
|
|
|
Stem
|
Rust |
Leaf
|
Rust | Stripe Rust | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AZ |
67
|
102.5
|
6,834
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
CA |
180
|
55
|
9,900
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
125
|
20
|
2506
|
CO |
90
|
112
|
10,080
|
0
|
0
|
*T
|
T
|
0
|
0
|
ID |
760
|
79
|
60,040
|
0
|
0
|
0.1
|
60
|
0.1
|
60
|
KS |
8
|
40
|
320
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
KY |
14
|
75
|
1,050
|
0
|
0
|
T
|
T
|
||
MI |
24
|
60
|
1,440
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
MN |
540
|
51
|
27,540
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
||
MT |
1,200
|
53
|
63,600
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
NE |
8
|
51
|
408
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
NC |
20
|
70
|
1,400
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
74
|
||
ND |
2,250
|
45
|
101,250
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
||
OK |
8
|
42
|
336
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
OR |
120
|
69
|
8,280
|
0.1
|
9
|
2
|
176
|
4
|
353
|
PA |
75
|
68
|
5,100
|
0
|
0
|
T
|
T
|
||
SC |
3
|
60
|
180
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
||
SD |
130
|
38
|
4,940
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
||
TX |
5
|
47
|
235
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
UT |
95
|
86
|
8,170
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
VA |
65
|
85
|
5,525
|
0
|
0
|
T
|
T
|
||
WA |
490
|
76
|
37,240
|
0.2
|
75
|
0.1
|
38
|
0.5
|
188
|
WI |
65
|
55
|
3,575
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
WY |
115
|
80
|
9,200
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
Total |
6,332
|
366,643
|
75
|
475
|
3107
|
||||
Average |
57.9
|
0.02
|
0.13
|
0.84
|
|||||
U.S. |
6,425
|
58.3
|
374,478
|
||||||
*T = Trace | |||||||||
Table 2. Barley genotypes used to differentiate isolates of Puccinia hordei
Genotype | Resistance gene(s) |
Sudan |
|
Peruvian |
|
Estate |
|
Gold |
|
Magnif |
|
Bolivia |
|
Cebada Capa |
|
Egypt 4 |
|
Hor 2596 |
|
Clip BC8 |
|
Clip BC67 |
|
Triumph |
|
Table 3. A proposed North American system of pathotype nomenclature for Puccinia hordei based on 12 differential barley hostsa Infection phenotype of pathogen and barley Rph genes
Set 1 | Rph1 | Rph2 | Rph3 | Rph4 |
Set 2 | Rph5 | Rph6+2 | Rph7 | Rph8 |
Set 3 | Rph9 | Rph10 | Rph11 | Rph12 |
Ph-code | ||||
B | Low | Low | Low | Low |
C | Low | Low | Low | High |
D | Low | Low | High | Low |
F | Low | Low | High | High |
G | Low | High | Low | Low |
H | Low | High | Low | High |
J | Low | High | High | Low |
K | Low | High | High | High |
L | High | Low | Low | Low |
M | High | Low | Low | High |
N | High | Low | High | Low |
P | High | Low | High | High |
Q | High | High | Low | Low |
R | High | High | Low | High |
S | High | High | High | Low |
T | High | High | High | High |
Table 4. Races of Puccinia hordei identified from the United States in 1997
Number of | |||
State | collections | Source | Pathotypes and (number of collections) |
Arizona |
|
Nursery | RHD(1) |
Arkansas |
|
Nursery | |
California |
|
Nursery | RHB(1), RCB(1), RBB(1),MBD(1), MCD(1) |
Minnesota |
|
Nursery | RHJ(1) |
North Dakota |
|
Field | MCJ(2), RHD(2), MBB(1), MCD(1) |
Pennsylvania |
|
Field | |
South Dakota |
|
Nursery | MHD(1) |
Tennesee |
|
Field | |
Virginia |
|
Nursery | MCD(1) |
TOTAL |
|